Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek is published by Springer Science+Business Media as a subscription journal (ISSN 0003-6072). The list article processing charge is $3,690. Its OpenAlex h-index is 157. Figures on this page are sourced from OpenAlex and DOAJ and should be confirmed on the journal’s own site before submission.
Time to publication
—
Not reported to DOAJ.
h-index
157
OpenAlex citation statistic. Not a Journal Impact Factor.
2-year mean citedness
2.3
Average citations to articles from the previous two years.
What it costs to publish here
Publishing an open-access article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek is listed at $3,690. The publisher also lists 2,890 EUR, 2,490 GBP. No waiver policy is recorded in our sources, which does not mean none exists. Ask.
What this journal has charged over time
List price for an open-access article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, as recorded by OpenAlex for each year. The fee has risen 18% since 2019, from $3,140 to $3,690.
Publishers change list prices without notice and often apply discounts, institutional agreements or waivers. Treat this as the trend, and confirm the current figure with the journal.
Peer review and licensing
| Review model | Not reported |
|---|---|
| Licence | Not reported |
| Author keeps copyright | Not reported |
| Plagiarism screening | Not reported |
| Editorial board | Not linked in DOAJ |
| Languages | Not reported |
Verification data is limited because this journal is not listed in DOAJ. Many long-established subscription journals are not in DOAJ and this does not indicate any quality concern.
Scope
The subjects Antonie van Leeuwenhoek publishes most, derived from the topics assigned to its indexed articles.
Publication record
| Indexed articles | 7,680 |
|---|---|
| Total citations | 200,730 |
| i10-index | 4,024 |
| Most recent indexed article | 2026 |
| All ISSNs | 0003-6072, 1572-9699 |
Counts reflect what OpenAlex has indexed and will differ from the publisher's own figures. We do not show a founding year: OpenAlex's first-publication dates are distorted by mis-dated records — it puts PLoS ONE in 1806 — and we would rather omit a number than print one we cannot stand behind.